ICDR Canada: Ad Hoc vs. Institutional Arbitration: What Best Serves Canada’s Future?

As arbitration in Canada continues to expand in complexity and international reach, practitioners and arbitrators are increasingly evaluating which procedural framework best supports efficiency, predictability, and enforceability. This panel will explore the practical distinctions between ad hoc and institutional arbitration, examining how each model performs in matters involving multi-party disputes, cross-border enforcement, emergency relief, arbitrator appointments, and procedural challenges.

Drawing on real-world experience, panelists will consider how administrative support, appointment oversight, procedural safeguards, and established rules can influence the conduct and outcome of proceedings. At the same time, the discussion will address the flexibility and autonomy often associated with ad hoc arbitration. The session invites participants to assess what structural choices will best position Canada’s arbitration community for continued growth, credibility, and global competitiveness.